COVID-19 ANNOUNCEMENT

In an effort to protect the health and well-being of our clients and staff, we will be operating using the latest technology. Our team at Schochor, Federico and Staton, P.A. remains available via phone, email, mail and/or video to conduct meetings and consultations. If you have a question about your case or would like a consultation, please contact us at 410-234-1000 or visit: https://www.sfspa.com/contact

We will also continue depositions, mediations, and all other legal work needed to handle your case. The health of our clients and staff is of utmost importance during this challenging time caused by the coronavirus (COVID-19). We’ve recovered over $1 billion for our clients and we won’t stop now.

SERVING MARYLAND AND WASHINGTON DC

FOR A FREE CONSULTATION, CALL US:


Menu

Case #1113: Aortic Dissection

$1,000,000

On November 7, the Decedent, age 43, saw the Defendant Physician. On presentation, the Decedent demonstrated signs and symptoms indicative of an aortic aneurysm/dissection (i.e. chest pain, evidence of pericardial effusion, aortic regurgitation, in addition to aortic dilatation). The Plaintiff alleged that the Decedent required a CT scan with contrast, an MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), or a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). Any of these tests and/or studies, if performed as required by the standards of care, would have confirmed the diagnosis of an aortic aneurysm/dissection, requiring immediate admission to the hospital.

A STAT (emergency) cardiac surgical consultation would have been obtained on a timely basis and the Decedent would have undergone surgery on an immediate basis. The Plaintiff alleged that had that occurred as required by the standards of care, the Decedent would have made an uneventful recovery, and would have returned to his family and resumed all of his activities with no deficits whatsoever.

Subsequently, the Decedent re-presented to the Defendant Physician’s office on November 21. The Defendant Physician noted left ventricular hypertrophy with pericardial effusion and mild aortic loop dilatation. Incredibly, the Defendant again negligently failed to perform any tests or studies required, negligently failed to rule in or rule out aneurysm/dissection.

The Decedent finally collapsed on December 14. He was rushed via ambulance to a local hospital, where he was pronounced dead. Autopsy protocol confirmed that his cause of death resulted from cardiac tamponade due to an undiagnosed and untreated aortic dissection.

Get A Consultation
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.