In an effort to protect the health and well-being of our clients and staff, we will be operating using the latest technology. Our team at Schochor, Federico and Staton, P.A. remains available via phone, email, mail and/or video to conduct meetings and consultations. If you have a question about your case or would like a consultation, please contact us at 410-234-1000 or visit:

We will also continue depositions, mediations, and all other legal work needed to handle your case. The health of our clients and staff is of utmost importance during this challenging time caused by the coronavirus (COVID-19). We’ve recovered over $1 billion for our clients and we won’t stop now.


Case #1009: Lung Cancer


The Plaintiffs’ decedent, age 70, was evaluated by the Defendant, an internist, numerous times over several years. The Defendant ordered multiple chest x-rays, which were interpreted as normal, despite the presence of a lesion in the right lung. Additional x-ray studies conducted each year for the next four years revealed that the right-sided lesion had continued to grow each year. However, these studies continued to be reported as normal. The decedent was never informed that he may have a malignancy in his lung. The lesion was left to grow unchecked for years, and it ultimately metastasized.

The decedent was diagnosed with lung cancer five years later, when he sought surgical evaluation for a lump in his neck. Tragically, by this time, the cancer had spread to his lymph nodes and the rest of his body. It was decided that chemotherapy and other treatments would not be effective. The decedent died of this disease the same year. The decedent’s mother and two adult children filed suit, alleging that the Defendant failed to properly interpret multiple chest x-rays between for a span of four years, as demonstrating a lesion in the right lung, which should have been diagnosed and reported to the decedent. The Plaintiffs further alleged that the standards of care mandated the Defendant to follow-up with appropriate diagnostic studies, which would have confirmed the presence of an early malignancy. Had the Defendant complied with the applicable standards of care as alleged by the Plaintiffs, the decedent would have received appropriate intervention and would have been cured of his disease. However, due to the ongoing failure to properly interpret the chest films, the lung cancer was left to grow, extend, metastasize, and kill the Plaintiffs’ decedent.

Get A Consultation
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.